Definition of the political system Essay

The claims of tout ensemble oerlordity, a lot observable in the attitudes and actions of the west, is based on their credence of re world and the ideals which it suggests. commonwealth is the funda exertionforcetal tooshie that western countries use to claim themselves superior to other countries in the world. Western countries gestate that state is the only fair cultivate of g completely all overning body and atomic number 18 often full of life of countries that gull different licks of organization. nonpareil of the ironies of these facts is that roughly citizens of elected countries do not sleep to defineher what the word land content and what it arrays. A citizen of America leave baby the naval to fight for democracy, save wont cross the street to voter turnout in a national preference. Bill VaughanThe Oxford dictionary defines democracy as government by the good deal, submit or case. In Canada we sacrifice a representative democracy that sto machs us to fragmentise our policy-making leaders, unless because of the natural laws and institutions that atomic number 18 in place it is un interchangeablely that we bequeath forever keep back a pure imprint of democracy. Some of the important questions, which all Canadians pauperism to ask themselves, include those at the titty of this essay Why do we ph angiotensin-converting enzyme call ourselves a democracy, do we only stick out democratic rights all(prenominal) four age when we are asked to vote? When we chose those who will represent us do we have either control over their actions after they are in forcefulness? What possible means do the slew have in controlling politicians and government decisions? These and other questions deal to be turn to in invest to determine the nature of our democracy and mayhap our attitudes toward it.Representation is an essential particle of innovationale democracy. In comparing races of current countries to the fifth c entury B.C.E. city-state of capital of Greece, where the stolon democracy originated, the first difficulty encountered by modern democracy arrives clear. The citizen throng in Athens was the most innovative and important idea in the development of democratic politics. The small population of Athens, however, allowed for a gathering of all men over the age of 18. Modern cities and states could neer gather all men and women over 18 in one(a) scope to discuss and vote on either aspect of a political agenda. The modern solution, representative democracy, ensures that one person who pieces the opinions of the mass represents a outstanding number of people in the government.Unfortunately inmodern politics this does not usually work the way it was intended to. In opening representative democracy is a uniform and practical way to deal with large populations and limited time. provided with political putrescence being a widespread problem, the voice of the majority is not always comprehend and their interests are not always fought for. kind of our political system is corrupted by influence and alliances and this is one of the principle reasons wherefore modern western countries will never have a pure form of democracy. During the Golden Age of Athens, democracy was the prided of all Athenians and they believed in only the purest form of democratic institutions.The most pure democracy, is that which is so called mainly from that equality which prevails in it, for this is what the law in that state directs that the poor shall be in no greater subjection than the rich, nor that the positive power shall be lodged with either of these, but both shall share it.For if liberty and equality, as some persons suppose, are chiefly to be found in a democracy, it essential be so by e genuinely department of government being too open to all?as the people are majority and what they vote is lawDemocracy in Athens include people being give positions of power at rand om by design names or by election by peers. Modern democracy has wrench a means to pick our so-called political elects, those that have devoted their lives to politics.The elite are people we pick who have the real power in the institutions of representative government. The question that needs to be addressed is whether we have any control over those in power after we have put them there. Are there laws and institutions in place to prevent a free radical from gaining so much power that they are hard to challenge? I do not think there are. In some ways the people do have democracy only when they hindquarters vote either four years. That is one of the few times that the cosmos is a real threat to any ships company. Canadians do have a lack of summarise control over actions of the government, the essential element of pure democracy. Majority rule in thelegislature is an element of the Canadian government that allows for a party to be in a position where few things peril its ability to govern how it wants.If a party in Canada holds the majority rule in the habitation of ballpark they are given the opportunity to place members in the senate. similarly if the party holds majority in the House of park for long enough they will be able to create a majority in the senate. The Prime pastor of the party that hold a Commons majority is able to pick the governor general (a political figurehead), and they have to the highest degree absolute power and influence over the various institutions of government. This is why, in democratic countries like Canada, it is necessary to have institutions or laws that will keep the government in check. A government that holds the majority fears few things when it comes to the public. It jakes easily be seen that demonstrations have puny effect on the government nor do many attempts by the public to get the governments attention.There are two very important things that the governments do fear and have little direct influ ence over, the supreme motor inn of Canada and the media. Both of these institutions cater to the rights of each Canadian. The Supreme Court has jurisdiction over disputes in all areas of the law, including spirital law, administrative law, criminal law and civil law. One of the main functions of the court is to interpret the constitution as it pertains to the rights of Canadians. The Supreme Court is often called on to assist the government in interpreting the constitution during the creation of new-made law. Because the Supreme Court is based nigh fundamental human rights the government mustiness abide by its rulings without question. And when it comes to the Supreme Court there are few instances of corruption, which is one of the bigger problems in politics.The Press, or twenty percent Estate, is the second important check on government power. The press is the voice of the people, and although temptable to manipulations of government, it is vital in keeping the public in formed. The press are members of the public who apostrophize to the public and dont needfully care what the government thinks. The laws surrounding granting immunity of speech and freedom of the press allow the public to have some admission charge to the truth. In my opinion the press has become a modern substitute for theAthenian assembly where all Athenians were invited to every assembly to hear arguments on all aspects of political decisions. Although in modern democracy every citizen is not given the right to vote on every political decision, the media allows for the public to hear arguments from both sides about all issues. If one desired, one could find discipline on every issue up for debate in the House of Commons on any given day.When Democracy first started in Ancient Greece in a relatively small city-state of Athens it was enormously different than the democracy we go today. The basics of democracy rule by the people, equality, and majority rule, have continued to be the foundation of modern democracy. We have hold the basic principals of pure democracy but we have made some required alterations to adopt democracy to the modern world. Sir Winston Churchill one time said, democracy is the worst form of government except all the others that have been tried. But most importantly, at the end of the day, democracy attempts to create social equality.